Building the report
Fetching market history…
First look at a coin takes a moment while we scan it. After that it is instant.
Coin Directory
屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle)屎壳郎
Rank #1888BNB Chain
屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) (屎壳郎) scores 49/100 on KoinLens — Weak.
- Is 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) a scam?
- KoinLens has found no automated red flags marking 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) (屎壳郎) as a scam. It scores 49/100 (Weak), a middling result. It trades 88% below its all-time high. Verify the contract on official channels and check liquidity before trading.
- Is 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) safe to buy?
- 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) scores 49/100 on KoinLens (Weak). It trades 88% below its all-time high. That reflects real, measurable weakness — most often a deep drawdown, sustained underperformance against Bitcoin, or thin liquidity. Size any position carefully and never invest more than you can afford to lose. This is a signal, not financial advice.
- Is 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) legit?
- 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) appears to be a real, tracked and tradeable cryptocurrency ranked #1888 — "legitimate" and "a good investment" are separate questions, and KoinLens answers both separately. Its score of 49/100 (Weak) reflects weak performance and/or risk signals, it trades 88% below its all-time high. rather than proof of anything dishonest. Research the team, the use case and the token's supply schedule before trusting it.
KoinLens rates 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) at 49/100 (Weak), from a transparent, rule-based blend weighted 60% toward performance — drawdown, how long it has been underwater and how it has fared against Bitcoin — and 40% toward trust signals such as contract security, liquidity, holder distribution, team transparency and exchange listings. Bitcoin is the benchmark every other coin is measured against. These are transparent, rule-based signals about the past — not human opinion, not a forecast, and not financial advice.
49/ 100
KoinLens ScoreWeak
Overall analytical assessment — project quality, asset performance, market health and risk.
Performance
41
60% weight
Trust & Safety
61
40% weight
0Band thresholds at 20 · 40 · 60 · 75 · 90100
76% of the indicators behind this score were evaluated from real data — the rest are estimated, so treat the number as approximate.
Measured (12)
- Contract Security
- Liquidity & Lock
- Holder Distribution
- Tokenomics
- Volume Quality
- Exchange Listings
- Community & Ecosystem
- Capital Preservation
- vs Bitcoin
- Scale & Durability
- Dilution Risk
- Recent Trend
Estimated (5)
- Developer Activity
- Team Transparency
- Age & Survival
- Price Structure
- Revenue & Usage
Estimated indicators still affect the score — the input was unavailable, so a neutral value stood in for it. We show which ones rather than presenting the number as complete.
屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) scores 49/100 on KoinLens (Weak) — 41/100 on performance and survival, 61/100 on trust and safety. Performance carries the most weight because a project can be entirely legitimate and still have lost most of its value. These are transparent, rule-based signals about the past — not a forecast, and not financial advice.
Relative performance
Not enough price history to compare against Bitcoin.
It is an overall analytical assessment of project quality, asset performance, market health and risk — a summary of the sections below, not a separate judgement.
It is not a probability, a percentage chance of success, a price target, or a recommendation to buy or sell. KoinLens knows nothing about your time horizon, entry price, position size or tax situation.
Mechanically it blends performance and survival (60%) with trust and safety (40%), then applies factual ceilings so that no amount of good paperwork can lift a coin that has lost most of its value. Not financial advice.
KoinLens Score v2.0 · rule-based signals · updated Sep 3, 2026· not financial advice
—Your goal
What are you researching this coin for?
The same findings, weighted differently depending on why you are looking. These are research views, not recommendations.
Weights fundamentals, survival and durability over recent price action.
- Fundamentals35%
- Performance30%
- Trust20%
- Security15%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Weights momentum and recent direction over project quality.
- Momentum50%
- Market Health30%
- Performance20%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Execution quality — depth, venue coverage and whether you can exit.
- Market Health50%
- Security30%
- Momentum20%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Development activity, revenue, usage and ecosystem health only.
- Fundamentals60%
- Trust25%
- Security15%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
—At a glance
What we checked
Each number is one part of the overall score. Tap any section below to see exactly what moved it.
TrustEST
45/100
Weak
Security
81/100
Strong
FundamentalsEST
63/100
Moderate
Performance
39/100
High Risk
Market Health
33/100
High Risk
Momentum
60/100
Moderate
Lenses are research views, not recommendations — KoinLens knows nothing about your time horizon, entry price or position size.
—Project quality
How strong is the project?
Credibility, technical risk and fundamentals behind 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) — independent of what the token price has done.
Measures project credibility, transparency, ecosystem maturity and external standing. It does not predict price performance.
The project publishes what an accountable team publishes.
- ✓Official website published+20
- ✓Public project description+15
- ✓Blockchain explorer linked+10
- •Named founders & company registrationNo free registry maps tokens to real identities — this indicator scores public disclosure, not verified identity.
Short track record.
- ✕Under a year old — no track record−25
- •Age approximated from earliest recorded priceNo genesis date published for this coin.
Ecosystem activity is modest for its market size.
- •No tracked TVLNot every asset is a DeFi chain or protocol — absence isn't automatically bad.
Limited presence on reputable exchanges.
- ✕Not listed on any tier-1 exchange−30
- •1 trading venues total
Measures technical and smart-contract risk indicators. A high score does not guarantee that a project cannot be exploited.
Automated contract checks surface no critical red flags.
- ✓Contract source verified / open+18
- ✓No honeypot pattern detected+10
- ✓No mint function — supply can't be inflated at will+8
- ✓No blacklist function+5
- ✓Trading cannot be paused by the owner+4
- ✓Ownership renounced+6
- •Trading tax: buy 3% / sell 3%
- •Third-party audit historyNo free audit registry API — not counted either way.
Ownership is concentrated — a few wallets could move the price.
- •Top holder controls 36.8%−12
- •25,931 holders
Measures underlying project activity, usage, development and economic health.
Repository stats aren't published by our source — estimated, not penalised.
- •No repository linked by the data providerAbsence of stats is not evidence of inactivity — several actively developed chains publish no repo link here. Scored neutrally and flagged, never counted as zero activity.
Supply structure is transparent with limited dilution risk.
- ✓Hard-capped max supply — no open-ended inflation+18
- •64% circulating — some unlocks remain+6
- ✓Market cap ≈ fully-diluted value — minimal hidden dilution+14
- •Vesting & unlock calendarCliff/linear unlock schedules need a paid data feed — not yet wired.
No tracked revenue or TVL.
- •No revenue or TVL trackedNot every asset is a fee-earning protocol — absence isn't automatically damning, so this scores neutrally rather than zero.
Supply is capped and largely distributed.
- ✓Hard-capped supply+20
- •64% circulating+8
- ✓Market cap ≈ fully-diluted value+12
—Asset quality
How has the token behaved?
Price history, market structure and tradability. A strong project can still have a weak asset — that gap is the point of splitting these.
Measures historical asset performance, drawdowns, survival and relative performance. Past results say nothing about future returns.
Has lost a large share of its peak value.
- ✕Down 88.1% from all-time high−35
- •Peak was ~0.2 years ago
No benchmark comparison available.
- •Not enough history to compare against Bitcoin
Structure unknown.
- •Not enough price history to read structure
Measures liquidity, volume quality, exchange coverage and market structure.
Liquidity is thin — size positions carefully.
- ✓Adequate daily turnover+22
- ✕Shallow 24h volume (<$1M) — slippage risk−8
- ✓Liquidity appears locked+10
Much of the reported volume is on unvetted exchanges.
- ✕Just 0% of volume on tier-1 exchanges — mostly unvetted venues−24
Small enough that a shock could be terminal.
- ✕$3.5M market cap — nano-cap, extreme fragility−32
Measures recent market trend and relative strength. This is the shortest-horizon and noisiest signal in the report.
Trend has been positive.
- ✓Up 0% over 1 year+14
- ✕Down 53% over 30 days−8
Unlock the full report
See the KoinLens Score breakdown, verdict, investment-decision panel and security checks — free with an account.
Already have an account?