Building the report
Fetching market history…
First look at a coin takes a moment while we scan it. After that it is instant.
Coin Directory
ADIADI
Rank #325Ethereum
ADI (ADI) scores 59/100 on KoinLens — Weak.
- Is ADI a scam?
- KoinLens has found no automated red flags marking ADI (ADI) as a scam. It scores 59/100 (Weak), a middling result. It trades 4% below its all-time high. Verify the contract on official channels and check liquidity before trading.
- Is ADI safe to buy?
- ADI scores 59/100 on KoinLens (Weak). It trades 4% below its all-time high. That reflects real, measurable weakness — most often a deep drawdown, sustained underperformance against Bitcoin, or thin liquidity. Size any position carefully and never invest more than you can afford to lose. This is a signal, not financial advice.
- Is ADI legit?
- ADI appears to be a real, tracked and tradeable cryptocurrency ranked #325 — "legitimate" and "a good investment" are separate questions, and KoinLens answers both separately. Its score of 59/100 (Weak) reflects weak performance and/or risk signals, it trades 4% below its all-time high. rather than proof of anything dishonest. Research the team, the use case and the token's supply schedule before trusting it.
KoinLens rates ADI at 59/100 (Weak), from a transparent, rule-based blend weighted 60% toward performance — drawdown, how long it has been underwater and how it has fared against Bitcoin — and 40% toward trust signals such as contract security, liquidity, holder distribution, team transparency and exchange listings. Bitcoin is the benchmark every other coin is measured against. These are transparent, rule-based signals about the past — not human opinion, not a forecast, and not financial advice.
59/ 100
KoinLens ScoreWeak
Overall analytical assessment — project quality, asset performance, market health and risk.
Performance
66
60% weight
Trust & Safety
48
40% weight
0Band thresholds at 20 · 40 · 60 · 75 · 90100
90% of the indicators behind this score were evaluated from real data.
Measured (14)
- Contract Security
- Liquidity & Lock
- Holder Distribution
- Tokenomics
- Volume Quality
- Exchange Listings
- Community & Ecosystem
- Capital Preservation
- vs Bitcoin
- Scale & Durability
- Price Structure
- Revenue & Usage
- Dilution Risk
- Recent Trend
Estimated (3)
- Developer Activity
- Team Transparency
- Age & Survival
Estimated indicators still affect the score — the input was unavailable, so a neutral value stood in for it. We show which ones rather than presenting the number as complete.
ADI scores 59/100 on KoinLens (Weak) — 66/100 on performance and survival, 48/100 on trust and safety. Performance carries the most weight because a project can be entirely legitimate and still have lost most of its value. These are transparent, rule-based signals about the past — not a forecast, and not financial advice.
Relative performance
vs Bitcoin (1y)-9.4%· market is bear
Measured against Bitcoin because in a market where everything falls together, falling is not informative — losing ground relative to the benchmark is. Underperforming Bitcoin during a Bitcoin-led cycle does not by itself mean the project is unhealthy.
It is an overall analytical assessment of project quality, asset performance, market health and risk — a summary of the sections below, not a separate judgement.
It is not a probability, a percentage chance of success, a price target, or a recommendation to buy or sell. KoinLens knows nothing about your time horizon, entry price, position size or tax situation.
Mechanically it blends performance and survival (60%) with trust and safety (40%), then applies factual ceilings so that no amount of good paperwork can lift a coin that has lost most of its value. Not financial advice.
KoinLens Score v2.0 · rule-based signals · updated Sep 3, 2026cached· not financial advice
—Your goal
What are you researching this coin for?
The same findings, weighted differently depending on why you are looking. These are research views, not recommendations.
Weights fundamentals, survival and durability over recent price action.
- Fundamentals35%
- Performance30%
- Trust20%
- Security15%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Weights momentum and recent direction over project quality.
- Momentum50%
- Market Health30%
- Performance20%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Execution quality — depth, venue coverage and whether you can exit.
- Market Health50%
- Security30%
- Momentum20%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
Development activity, revenue, usage and ecosystem health only.
- Fundamentals60%
- Trust25%
- Security15%
A research lens, not a recommendation — it reweights the same evidence for a different question.
—At a glance
What we checked
Each number is one part of the overall score. Tap any section below to see exactly what moved it.
TrustEST
61/100
Moderate
Security
67/100
Moderate
Fundamentals
39/100
High Risk
Performance
90/100
Excellent
Market Health
51/100
Weak
Momentum
76/100
Strong
Lenses are research views, not recommendations — KoinLens knows nothing about your time horizon, entry price or position size.
—Project quality
How strong is the project?
Credibility, technical risk and fundamentals behind ADI — independent of what the token price has done.
Measures project credibility, transparency, ecosystem maturity and external standing. It does not predict price performance.
The project publishes what an accountable team publishes.
- ✓Official website published+20
- ✓Public project description+15
- ✓Blockchain explorer linked+10
- •Named founders & company registrationNo free registry maps tokens to real identities — this indicator scores public disclosure, not verified identity.
Short track record.
- ✕Under a year old — no track record−25
- •Age approximated from earliest recorded priceNo genesis date published for this coin.
Ecosystem activity is modest for its market size.
- ✓TVL is 5% of market cap+12
Available on exchanges with real listing standards.
- ✓Listed on 3 tier-1 exchanges+18
- •5 trading venues total
Measures technical and smart-contract risk indicators. A high score does not guarantee that a project cannot be exploited.
Automated contract checks surface no critical red flags.
- ✓Contract source verified / open+18
- ✓Ownership renounced+6
- •Upgradeable proxy — logic can change after deploy
- •Third-party audit historyNo free audit registry API — not counted either way.
Ownership is concentrated — a few wallets could move the price.
- •Top holder controls 32.6%−12
- •17,327 holders
Measures underlying project activity, usage, development and economic health.
Repository stats aren't published by our source — estimated, not penalised.
- •No repository linked by the data providerAbsence of stats is not evidence of inactivity — several actively developed chains publish no repo link here. Scored neutrally and flagged, never counted as zero activity.
Supply structure carries dilution or emission risk.
- ✓Hard-capped max supply — no open-ended inflation+18
- ✕Only 1% circulating — heavy future dilution−12
- ✕FDV is 106.6× market cap — large locked supply overhang−16
- •Vesting & unlock calendarCliff/linear unlock schedules need a paid data feed — not yet wired.
Little measurable revenue or capital committed for its valuation.
- ✓TVL is 5% of market cap+6
Holders face meaningful dilution.
- ✓Hard-capped supply+20
- ✕Only 1% circulating — heavy dilution ahead−18
- ✕FDV is 106.6× market cap−18
—Asset quality
How has the token behaved?
Price history, market structure and tradability. A strong project can still have a weak asset — that gap is the point of splitting these.
Measures historical asset performance, drawdowns, survival and relative performance. Past results say nothing about future returns.
Has held its value reasonably well versus its peak.
- ✓Within 6.7% of all-time high+25
Has kept pace with or beaten Bitcoin.
- ✓Holding its value against Bitcoin (-9.4% from its BTC peak)+30
- ✓Held its floor against Bitcoin through the downturn+10
- •Recent 35% spike against Bitcoin not yet provenThis week is well above the 90-day average. Short pumps often round-trip within weeks, so the gain is discounted until it holds.−10
Downside appears to be stabilising.
- ✓Holding higher lows — a base is formingQuarterly lows: 0.99 → 2.92 → 3.66 → 5.03.+25
Measures liquidity, volume quality, exchange coverage and market structure.
Liquidity is thin — size positions carefully.
- ✓Healthy turnover — volume is a sane share of market cap+32
- •No locked liquidity detectedEither the pool is unlocked or the provider has no data. Verify before trading — see penalties.
Volume is concentrated on reputable, vetted venues.
- ✓71% of volume on tier-1 exchanges+30
- •Listed on KuCoin, Kraken, Crypto.com Exchange
Small enough that a shock could be terminal.
- ✕$76.3M market cap — nano-cap, extreme fragility−32
Measures recent market trend and relative strength. This is the shortest-horizon and noisiest signal in the report.
Trend has been positive.
- ✓Up 0% over 1 year+14
- ✓Up 18% over 30 days+8
Unlock the full report
See the KoinLens Score breakdown, verdict, investment-decision panel and security checks — free with an account.
Already have an account?